Sponsor(s):
Rep. John F. Knight and over 40 other members
Summary: Proposed amendment to the Constitution of Alabama of 1901 to repeal Amendment 225, to limit the state income tax deduction for federal income taxes for individual taxpayers; and to exempt sales of food from state sales tax.
Provisions:
For all tax years beginning after December 31, 2010, federal income taxes allowed as a deduction for individual income taxpayers, subject to the new limitations:
      (1) For single, married filing separately, and head of household taxpayers with adjusted gross income of $50,000 or less, and for married taxpayers filing jointly with adjusted gross income of $100,000 or less, all federal income taxes paid or accrued shall be allowed as a deduction.
      (2) For single, married filing separately, and head of household taxpayers with adjusted gross income of more than $50,000, the federal income tax deduction shall be reduced by an amount equal to 1% of federal income taxes paid or accrued for each $1,500 of adjusted gross income in excess of $50,000.
      (3) For married taxpayers filing jointly with adjusted gross income of more than $100,000, the federal income tax deduction shall be reduced by an amount equal to 1% federal income taxes paid or accrued for each $3,000 of adjusted gross income in excess of $100,000.
Beginning January 1, 2011, the sale of food shall be exempt from state sales tax. Local governments shall continue to levy sales taxes on food at the same rate collected for the local portion of the retail sales tax.
A section of the amendment defines “food” to mean the definition used in the Federal Food Stamp Act, states food does not include “candy” or “soft drinks” (both of which are defined in the constitutional amendment) and declares that if the federal law no longer exists, the Legislature will define food by general law.
See Bill Progress for bill substitute.
League Action & Justification: LWVAL is monitoring HB 1. The League position on Tax Reform supports elimination of the sales tax on groceries but it also supports other reforms. The bill does not improve the situation relative to those issues. It continues to place inappropriate material in the state constitution.
Bill Progress in the Legislature:
1st Read: 1/12/10 and assigned to
3/31/2010: listed on Education Appropriations meeting agenda, Rm. 617, 9:30 a.m.
4/1/2010: 2nd read and placed on calendar with one substitute (119309-4), pending 3rd read and favorable from Education Appropriations.
Note: The substitute represents major changes in the bill.
Under “provisions” specifying the conditions for deducting the federal income tax, the amounts in item (1) are changed from $50,000 to $100,000 respectively; in item (2) from $50,000 to $100,000 and the 1% reduction would now apply to each of $500 instead of $1,500; and in item (3) the $100,000 is changed to $200,000 and 1% would apply to each $1,000 instead of each $3.000.
The sales tax emption would now apply to all food regardless of where or how it is sold, and the definition of food is now based on the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program definition. Over-the-counter drugs would now be exempt from sales taxes. There is a long definition of what is and is not an over-the-counter drug.
Lastly, the new bill explicitly states that local government sales taxes on food and over-the-counter drugs would be permissible only if the sales tax is not limited to these two categories.
A fiscal note is now available and places the impact of the substitute as reducing sales tax collections to the Education Trust Fund by $405M and raising income tax collections to the ETF by $407M.
4/14/2010: Indefinitely postponed; pending 3rd read and favorable from Education Appropriations with one substitute.