- \
Follow LWVAL. About the League
Become a
LWV Member.
Donate to support
our work.
Already a member?
Just need to renew?
Pay Dues
We appreciate
your membership!
Where We Stand
Donate
Join Us
Pay Dues
Contact League
Baldwin Co.
Greater Birmingham
Greater Shoals NEW! Florence, Muscle Shoals, Tuscumbia
Greater Tuscaloosa
East Alabama
Mobile
Montgomery
Tenn. Valley NEW! Huntsville, Madison
LWVAL
LWVUS
Quick Links for CitizensVoting & Elections
Register to vote
Find Your Polling Place
Restore your voting rights
"About the Help America Vote Act" (pdf)
Vote411.org
Read more
State Legislature & Congress
Who Speaks for You?
Find State Legislation & Take Action
The AL Legislature: Facts & Issues
Courts
"The Courts and Judicial Selection in AL" (pdf)
Environment
Learn & Vote: Natural Resources & the Environment
The Alabama Constitution
Resources on Constitutional Reform in AL
Health Care
More issues...
Other Issues - Criminal Justice
LWVAL Action Priority Level III - Issues identified by LWVAL Advocacy Committee and/or State Board or Local Leagues. Monitoring occurs; action dependent on opportunity and available resources.Click a bill to see sponsor(s), synopsis, link to the bill, League action and justification for that action, and progress of the bill through the legislative process.
Legend:
= LWVAL's support for the legislation. 
= LWVAL's opposition to the legislation.
= new bill activity; change from previous week's report such as new progress in the legislature and/or League action. Bill may be one newly added to the report. These updates are in green font.Contact information for legislators and committees referenced in the bills below:
Representatives Standing House Committees Senators Standing Senate Committees Find my legislators
LWVAL has taken a position on these bills:
HB28 - Criminal records, expunged of, eligibility expanded to include add'l offenses and youthful offender adjudications, filing fees, distrib. of fees revised, Secs. 15-27-1, 15-27-2, 15-27-3,15-27-4, 15-27-6, 15-27-7, 15-27-8 am'd.
SB119 - Expungement of criminal records, authorized for youthful offenders, Sec. 15-27-2.1 added
HB28 Sponsor(s): Rep. England
SB119 Sponsor(s): Senator Whatley
Synopsis: This bill expands the ways persons can expunge past criminal convictions from their records. It allows for automatic expungement upon the successful completion of such prosecution diversion programs as drug court, veterans court, or court ordered mental health counseling. It also allows expungement for youthful offenders and many kinds of minor offenses (but not for sex offenses or domestic violence offenses) as well as for offenses that have been officially pardoned.
League Action and Justification: Support. The bill promotes court diversion and counseling programs which the league supports. It also supposes the idea that rehabilitation is the goal of the criminal justice system, another concept that the league supports – unfortunately, if the expungement is not automatic (as it would be for successful completion of a prosecution diversion program), it is expensive for low income persons ($300 filing fee and $500 administrative charge).
Bill Progress in Legislature:
HB 28
02/07/2017: First Read and assigned to House Judiciary Committee (JUD)
SB119
02/07/2017: First Read and assigned to Senate committee Judiciary (JUD)
04/27/2017: 2nd Read and placed on the calendar; pending 3rd Read and Favorable form JUD
05/17/2017: Indefinitely postponed.
SB119 Sponsor(s): Senator Whatley
Synopsis: This bill expands the ways persons can expunge past criminal convictions from their records. It allows for automatic expungement upon the successful completion of such prosecution diversion programs as drug court, veterans court, or court ordered mental health counseling. It also allows expungement for youthful offenders and many kinds of minor offenses (but not for sex offenses or domestic violence offenses) as well as for offenses that have been officially pardoned.
League Action and Justification: Support. The bill promotes court diversion and counseling programs which the league supports. It also supposes the idea that rehabilitation is the goal of the criminal justice system, another concept that the league supports – unfortunately, if the expungement is not automatic (as it would be for successful completion of a prosecution diversion program), it is expensive for low income persons ($300 filing fee and $500 administrative charge).
Bill Progress in Legislature:
HB 28
02/07/2017: First Read and assigned to House Judiciary Committee (JUD)
SB119
02/07/2017: First Read and assigned to Senate committee Judiciary (JUD)
04/27/2017: 2nd Read and placed on the calendar; pending 3rd Read and Favorable form JUD
05/17/2017: Indefinitely postponed.
SB35 - Domestic violence, protection orders, definitions clarified, notice of hearing and service of process requirements clarified, fines and penalties for violations clarified, Sec. 13A-6-139.1 repealed; Secs. 13A-6-130, 13A-6-131, 13A-6-132, 13A-6-134, 13A-6-138, 13A-6-142, 15-10-3, 15-13-190, 15-23-68, 30-5-2, 30-5-3, 30-5-5, 30-5-8 am'd.
Sponsor(s): Senator Scofield
Synopsis: Under existing law, the commission of domestic violence is a crime, and there are provisions to protect domestic violence victims from further acts of violence. Furthermore, during the 2015 Regular Session, significant revisions were made to existing provisions in law governing domestic violence offenses and domestic violence protection orders (Act 2015-496).
This bill would clarify certain provisions of Act 2015-496, including clarification of definitions, including dating relationships and household members, certain requirements for sworn petitions for protection orders, notice of hearing and service of process requirements, fines and penalties for violations of protection orders, arrests without warrants for violation of protection orders, release and bail of domestic violence offenders, and provisions governing domestic violence by strangulation or suffocation.
League Action and Justification: Support. An importation part of the principles upon which the League of Women Voters was founded is that government “share in the solution of economic and social problems that affect the general welfare…”
Domestic violence occurs without distinction among demographic groups, including race, economic class, age, sexual preference, educational level, occupational category. Its impacts (short-term and long-term) include among other things added costs to law enforcement, the courts, and medical systems; traumatic stress disorder in the victims (the abused and the young who witness the abuse) and such related negative behaviors are acting out, poor school performance and depression; perpetuation of abuse across generations; and much more.
Act 2015-496 was supported by League, and this bill seeks to improve that legislation.
Bill Progress in Legislature:
02/07/2017: First Read and referred to Senate committee on Judiciary (JUD)
05/03/2017: 2nd Read and placed on the calendar with 1 Substitute (186360-2); pending 3rd Read and Favorable from JUD with 1 Substitute; JUD 1st Substitute Offered.
[NOTE (Major Changes): Substitute clarifies that household victims include step children and step parents but excludes nonromantic or non-intimate co-residents. Add the full list of those who can be victims of DV strangulation or suffocation. Those who violate protective orders will pay a $50 fine to the DV Trust Fund. Reasonable cause changed to probable cause for arrests and time limits on holding those arrested before they appear in court.]
05/09/2017: 3rd Read Passed; JUD 1st Substitute (186360-2) Offered; Scofield Motion to Adopt adopted by Roll Call; Scofield Amendment (186678-1) Offered; Scofield motion to Adopt adopted by Roll Call; Motion to Read a 3rd Time and Pass adopted by Roll Call; Engrossed
House Action:
05/11/2017: Read for the first time and referred to the House committee on Judiciary (JUD)
05/16/2017: 2nd Read and placed on the calendar; pending 3rd Read and Favorable from JUD
Synopsis: Under existing law, the commission of domestic violence is a crime, and there are provisions to protect domestic violence victims from further acts of violence. Furthermore, during the 2015 Regular Session, significant revisions were made to existing provisions in law governing domestic violence offenses and domestic violence protection orders (Act 2015-496).
This bill would clarify certain provisions of Act 2015-496, including clarification of definitions, including dating relationships and household members, certain requirements for sworn petitions for protection orders, notice of hearing and service of process requirements, fines and penalties for violations of protection orders, arrests without warrants for violation of protection orders, release and bail of domestic violence offenders, and provisions governing domestic violence by strangulation or suffocation.
League Action and Justification: Support. An importation part of the principles upon which the League of Women Voters was founded is that government “share in the solution of economic and social problems that affect the general welfare…”
Domestic violence occurs without distinction among demographic groups, including race, economic class, age, sexual preference, educational level, occupational category. Its impacts (short-term and long-term) include among other things added costs to law enforcement, the courts, and medical systems; traumatic stress disorder in the victims (the abused and the young who witness the abuse) and such related negative behaviors are acting out, poor school performance and depression; perpetuation of abuse across generations; and much more.
Act 2015-496 was supported by League, and this bill seeks to improve that legislation.
Bill Progress in Legislature:
02/07/2017: First Read and referred to Senate committee on Judiciary (JUD)
05/03/2017: 2nd Read and placed on the calendar with 1 Substitute (186360-2); pending 3rd Read and Favorable from JUD with 1 Substitute; JUD 1st Substitute Offered.
[NOTE (Major Changes): Substitute clarifies that household victims include step children and step parents but excludes nonromantic or non-intimate co-residents. Add the full list of those who can be victims of DV strangulation or suffocation. Those who violate protective orders will pay a $50 fine to the DV Trust Fund. Reasonable cause changed to probable cause for arrests and time limits on holding those arrested before they appear in court.]
05/09/2017: 3rd Read Passed; JUD 1st Substitute (186360-2) Offered; Scofield Motion to Adopt adopted by Roll Call; Scofield Amendment (186678-1) Offered; Scofield motion to Adopt adopted by Roll Call; Motion to Read a 3rd Time and Pass adopted by Roll Call; Engrossed
House Action:
05/11/2017: Read for the first time and referred to the House committee on Judiciary (JUD)
05/16/2017: 2nd Read and placed on the calendar; pending 3rd Read and Favorable from JUD
HB298 - Domestic violence, increased incarceration periods and enhanced penalties for convictions of first, second, or third degree domestic violence if committed in the presence of a minor, capital offense expanded to include murder of a parent or guardian in the presence of a child, Hollie's Law, Secs. 13A-5-40, 13A-6-130, 13A-6-131, 13A-6-132 am'd.
Sponsor(s): Representatives Pettus, Ledbetter, Faulkner, Williams (P), Williams (JW), Shedd, Wood, Patterson, Fridy, Sessions, South, Rowe, Weaver and Greer
Synopsis: Under existing law, certain periods of incarceration are required for persons convicted of first, second, or third degree domestic violence. This bill would double the incarceration periods for convictions of first or second degree domestic violence if a child under the age of 18 years witnessed the domestic violence and would provide increased incarceration periods for a first conviction of third degree domestic violence if a child under the age of 18 years witnessed the domestic violence and enhanced penalties for second, third, or subsequent convictions of third degree domestic violence if a child witnessed the domestic violence.
Also under existing law, a person who commits a capital offense may be sentenced to death or life without parole. This bill would include as a capital offense murder by the defendant that is witnessed by a child under the age of 18 years, if the victim was the parent or legal guardian of the child.
League Action and Justification: Oppose. League does not support the use of the death penalty. And, the child witness could be further traumatized by the carrying out of the death penalty if the perpetrator is a parent or guardian.
Bill Progress in Legislature:
02/23/2017: First Read and referred to the House committee on Judiciary (JUD)
05/02/2017: 2nd Read and placed on the calendar; pending 3rd Read and Favorable from JUD
05/17/2017: Indefinitely postponed.
Synopsis: Under existing law, certain periods of incarceration are required for persons convicted of first, second, or third degree domestic violence. This bill would double the incarceration periods for convictions of first or second degree domestic violence if a child under the age of 18 years witnessed the domestic violence and would provide increased incarceration periods for a first conviction of third degree domestic violence if a child under the age of 18 years witnessed the domestic violence and enhanced penalties for second, third, or subsequent convictions of third degree domestic violence if a child witnessed the domestic violence.
Also under existing law, a person who commits a capital offense may be sentenced to death or life without parole. This bill would include as a capital offense murder by the defendant that is witnessed by a child under the age of 18 years, if the victim was the parent or legal guardian of the child.
League Action and Justification: Oppose. League does not support the use of the death penalty. And, the child witness could be further traumatized by the carrying out of the death penalty if the perpetrator is a parent or guardian.
Bill Progress in Legislature:
02/23/2017: First Read and referred to the House committee on Judiciary (JUD)
05/02/2017: 2nd Read and placed on the calendar; pending 3rd Read and Favorable from JUD
05/17/2017: Indefinitely postponed.
HB280 - Employment practice, unlawful to inquire from job applicant information relating to arrests or conviction of crimes, criminal record, with exceptions
Sponsor: Representative Givan
Synopsis: This is a "ban-the-box" provision. The state, its agencies, and political subdivisions shall be prohibited from inquiring into a job applicant's conviction history until a conditional job offer has been made. Prior convictions may be considered only if relevant to the position to be offered.
League Action and Justification: Support. LWVAL's position states: "[League] supports the concept of rehabilitation as a major goal of the criminal justice system." This bill would promote rehabilitation.
Bill Progress in Legislature:
02/21/2017: Read for the first time and referred to the House committee on State Government (SG)
Synopsis: This is a "ban-the-box" provision. The state, its agencies, and political subdivisions shall be prohibited from inquiring into a job applicant's conviction history until a conditional job offer has been made. Prior convictions may be considered only if relevant to the position to be offered.
League Action and Justification: Support. LWVAL's position states: "[League] supports the concept of rehabilitation as a major goal of the criminal justice system." This bill would promote rehabilitation.
Bill Progress in Legislature:
02/21/2017: Read for the first time and referred to the House committee on State Government (SG)
SB294 - Municipal courts, pretrial diversion program, voluntary transfer authorized
Sponsor(s): Senator Ward
Synopsis: Municipal Courts would be authorized to transfer cases to District Court in order to give the charged access to pre-trial diversion programs.
League Action and Justification: Support. This bill is in line with our position on Criminal Justice.
Bill Progress in Legislature:
03/09/2017: Read for the first time and referred to the Senate committee on Judiciary (JUD)
04/06/2017: 2nd Read and placed on the calendar; pending 3rd Read and Favorable from JUD
04/11/2017: 3rd Reading Passed; Motion ot Read a 3rd Time and Pass adopted by Roll Call
House Action:
04/11/2017: Read for the first time and referred to the House committee on Judiciary (JUD)
Synopsis: Municipal Courts would be authorized to transfer cases to District Court in order to give the charged access to pre-trial diversion programs.
League Action and Justification: Support. This bill is in line with our position on Criminal Justice.
Bill Progress in Legislature:
03/09/2017: Read for the first time and referred to the Senate committee on Judiciary (JUD)
04/06/2017: 2nd Read and placed on the calendar; pending 3rd Read and Favorable from JUD
04/11/2017: 3rd Reading Passed; Motion ot Read a 3rd Time and Pass adopted by Roll Call
House Action:
04/11/2017: Read for the first time and referred to the House committee on Judiciary (JUD)
SB344 - Municipal courts, municipal judges, to require defendants to be released as an unsecured appearance bond or on personal recognizance, with exceptions, Sec. 12-14-5 am'd.
Sponsor(s): Senator Albritton
Synopsis: This bill would require municipal judges to release persons coming before them for violation of a municipal ordinance, without the requirement of bail. The person charged would be issued a citation requiring appearance at a specified time. There is an exception if the person is preliminarily deemed to be a danger to himself, herself or others, or if the release will not reasonably guarantee the person's appearance as ordered. In such cases, a hearing on such finding must be held within 48 hours of an arrest without a warrant or 72 hours of an arrest with a warrant.
League Action and Justification: Support. LWVUS policy states that the nature and severity of the crime charged should be taken into account. Indigent persons accused of minor violations are often unable to raise bail and wind up spending significant time in jail. This bill would help alleviate that problem.
Bill Progress in Legislature:
04/ 04/2017: Read for the first time and referred to the Senate committee on the Judiciary
4/13/2017: 2nd Read and place on the Calendar with 1 Amendment (184941-2); pending 3rd Read and Favorable from JUD with ! Amendment; JUD 1st Amendment Offered.
[NOTE: The amendment add the following to the bill: “"(2) If financial conditions of bail are set, the municipal judge shall first ensure that the defendant can afford to pay the financial obligations without substantial hardship, and shall explain this finding in the written findings made on the record.” "(3) If for any reason the defendant is unable to pay any financial conditions of bail imposed, the municipal judge shall waive or reduce the financial conditions upon satisfactory showing that the defendant is indigent or otherwise unable to make bond, and may impose additional non-financial conditions of release.” ]
05/17/2017: Indefinitely postponed.
Synopsis: This bill would require municipal judges to release persons coming before them for violation of a municipal ordinance, without the requirement of bail. The person charged would be issued a citation requiring appearance at a specified time. There is an exception if the person is preliminarily deemed to be a danger to himself, herself or others, or if the release will not reasonably guarantee the person's appearance as ordered. In such cases, a hearing on such finding must be held within 48 hours of an arrest without a warrant or 72 hours of an arrest with a warrant.
League Action and Justification: Support. LWVUS policy states that the nature and severity of the crime charged should be taken into account. Indigent persons accused of minor violations are often unable to raise bail and wind up spending significant time in jail. This bill would help alleviate that problem.
Bill Progress in Legislature:
04/ 04/2017: Read for the first time and referred to the Senate committee on the Judiciary
4/13/2017: 2nd Read and place on the Calendar with 1 Amendment (184941-2); pending 3rd Read and Favorable from JUD with ! Amendment; JUD 1st Amendment Offered.
[NOTE: The amendment add the following to the bill: “"(2) If financial conditions of bail are set, the municipal judge shall first ensure that the defendant can afford to pay the financial obligations without substantial hardship, and shall explain this finding in the written findings made on the record.” "(3) If for any reason the defendant is unable to pay any financial conditions of bail imposed, the municipal judge shall waive or reduce the financial conditions upon satisfactory showing that the defendant is indigent or otherwise unable to make bond, and may impose additional non-financial conditions of release.” ]
05/17/2017: Indefinitely postponed.
HB537 - Genital mutilation, making act on female under 19 years of age a Class B felony
Sponsor(s): Representative Scott
Synopsis: This legislation would make genital mutilation of a female under the age of 19 a Class B felony. Any person who performs the procedure or a parent or guardian who consents to it being performed on his or her child would be guilty. Religious reasons for the procedure would not be allowed as a defense, nor would consent of the person on whom it is performed.
League Action and Justification: Support. Although League positions do not contain references to female genital mutilation, the bill can be supported by positions on both the protection of children and protection against violence against women.
Bill Progress in Legislature:
04/18/2017: Read for the first time and referred to the House committee on Judiciary (JUD)
05/09/2017: 2nd Read and placed on the calendar; pend in and [DELETE and] Favorable from JUD
05/17/2017: Indefinitely postponed.
Synopsis: This legislation would make genital mutilation of a female under the age of 19 a Class B felony. Any person who performs the procedure or a parent or guardian who consents to it being performed on his or her child would be guilty. Religious reasons for the procedure would not be allowed as a defense, nor would consent of the person on whom it is performed.
League Action and Justification: Support. Although League positions do not contain references to female genital mutilation, the bill can be supported by positions on both the protection of children and protection against violence against women.
Bill Progress in Legislature:
04/18/2017: Read for the first time and referred to the House committee on Judiciary (JUD)
05/09/2017: 2nd Read and placed on the calendar; pend in and [DELETE and] Favorable from JUD
05/17/2017: Indefinitely postponed.
HB582 - Custodial sexual misconduct, crimes further defined, community corrections program, alcohol or drug abuse court referral and treatment program included, Secs. 14-11-30, 14-11-31 am'd.
Sponsor(s): Representative Butler
Synopsis: This bill relates to sexual misconduct by an employee against a person in governmental custody. It further defines "employee" to include contractors and agents of contractors (although it is poorly worded, and needs serious revision). It also expands the protection to include those who are in community corrections programs and drug and alcohol abuse programs by court referral.
League Action and Justification: Support. Protects those in custody from abuse.
Bill Progress in Legislature:
05/02/2017: Read for the first time and referred to the House committee on Judiciary (JUD)
Synopsis: This bill relates to sexual misconduct by an employee against a person in governmental custody. It further defines "employee" to include contractors and agents of contractors (although it is poorly worded, and needs serious revision). It also expands the protection to include those who are in community corrections programs and drug and alcohol abuse programs by court referral.
League Action and Justification: Support. Protects those in custody from abuse.
Bill Progress in Legislature:
05/02/2017: Read for the first time and referred to the House committee on Judiciary (JUD)
LWVAL is monitoring these bills:
HB279 - Expungement of criminal records, expanded to include all felony offenses subject to a successful malicious prosecution civil claim, Sec. 15-27-2 am'd.
Sponsor: Representative Baker
Synopsis: Currently, a person may petition the court to expunge records of charges for other than violent felony charges, under certain circumstances. This expands the type of charges that may be expunged when the person is found not guilty, to include violent felony charges.
League Action and Justification: Monitor. League has no position on this issue.
Bill Progress in Legislature:
02/21/2017: Read for the 1st time and referred to the House committee on Judiciary (JUD)
03/02/2017: 2nd Read and placed on the calendar with 1 Amendment (183351-1); pending 3rd Read and favorable from JUD with 1 amendment
[NOTE: The amendment sets up procedures for potential release of the expunged record in case of civil suit arising from the arrest or conviction that was the subject of the expungement.]
03/07/2017: Third Reading Carried Over; Holmes (M) Amendment (183612-1) Offered; Motion to Adopt adopted by Roll Call; Holmes (M) motion to Carry Over Temporarily adopted by Voice Vote; Holmes (M) motion to Carry Over Temporarily adopted Voice Vote
04/06/2017: 3rd Read Passed; JUD Amendment (183351-1) Offered; Motion to Adopt adopted by Roll Call; Motion to Read a 3rd Time and Pass adopted by Roll Call; Engrossed
[NOTE: JUD Amendment sets procedures and limits for asking for expunged records for use in court and would make law apply retroactively.]
Senate Action:
04/11/2017: Read for the first time and referred to the Senate committee on Judiciary (JUD)
04/20/2017: 2nd Read and place on the calendar; pending 3rd Read and Favorable from JUD
05/17/2017: 3rd Reading Carried Over to Call of the Chair; Williams motion to Carry Over to the Call of the Chair adopted by Voice Vote; 3rd Read Passed; Motion to Read a Third Time and Pass adopted Roll Call; Signature Requested
House Action:
05/7/2017: Passed 2nd House; Enrolled; Clerk of the House Certification; Forwarded to Executive Department
Synopsis: Currently, a person may petition the court to expunge records of charges for other than violent felony charges, under certain circumstances. This expands the type of charges that may be expunged when the person is found not guilty, to include violent felony charges.
League Action and Justification: Monitor. League has no position on this issue.
Bill Progress in Legislature:
02/21/2017: Read for the 1st time and referred to the House committee on Judiciary (JUD)
03/02/2017: 2nd Read and placed on the calendar with 1 Amendment (183351-1); pending 3rd Read and favorable from JUD with 1 amendment
[NOTE: The amendment sets up procedures for potential release of the expunged record in case of civil suit arising from the arrest or conviction that was the subject of the expungement.]
03/07/2017: Third Reading Carried Over; Holmes (M) Amendment (183612-1) Offered; Motion to Adopt adopted by Roll Call; Holmes (M) motion to Carry Over Temporarily adopted by Voice Vote; Holmes (M) motion to Carry Over Temporarily adopted Voice Vote
04/06/2017: 3rd Read Passed; JUD Amendment (183351-1) Offered; Motion to Adopt adopted by Roll Call; Motion to Read a 3rd Time and Pass adopted by Roll Call; Engrossed
[NOTE: JUD Amendment sets procedures and limits for asking for expunged records for use in court and would make law apply retroactively.]
Senate Action:
04/11/2017: Read for the first time and referred to the Senate committee on Judiciary (JUD)
04/20/2017: 2nd Read and place on the calendar; pending 3rd Read and Favorable from JUD
05/17/2017: 3rd Reading Carried Over to Call of the Chair; Williams motion to Carry Over to the Call of the Chair adopted by Voice Vote; 3rd Read Passed; Motion to Read a Third Time and Pass adopted Roll Call; Signature Requested
House Action:
05/7/2017: Passed 2nd House; Enrolled; Clerk of the House Certification; Forwarded to Executive Department
HB304 - Elderly, Elder Abuse Protection Orders, authorized, elder abuse defined, Sec. 15-10-3 am'd.
Sponsor(s): Representative Scott
Synopsis: The bill establishes the Elder Abuse Protection Order and Enforcement Act. The act creates a method for obtaining a protection order against an individual who has committed elder abuse and expands the ability of law enforcement to assist victims by allowing for arrest without warrants as amended under Section 15-10-3. An order is defined as a restraint order, injunctive order, order of release from custody and may be issued by a circuit, district, municipal or probate court. Elderly person is defined as a person 60 years of age or older.
League Action and Justification: Monitor. While this legislation provides for speedier protection for victims and aligns with that relating to domestic abuse, there is no directly applicable League position on elder abuse.
Bill Progress in Legislature:
02 /23/2017: First Reading and referred to House committee on Judiciary (JUD)
05/04/2017: 3rd Reading Carried Over; JUD Amendment (185589-1); Scott motion to Table adopted by Roll Call; Scott motion to Substitute SB274 for HB304 adopted by Voice Vote; Scott motion to reconsider JUD amendment adopted by Voice Vote; Scott motion to remove from the table the Judy amendment adopted; Scott motion to Carry Over Temporarily adopted by Voice Vote; Third Reading Open; Scott motion to Table Judy amendment adopted by Roll Call; Scott motion to Substitute SB274 FOR HB304 adopted by Voice Vote
Synopsis: The bill establishes the Elder Abuse Protection Order and Enforcement Act. The act creates a method for obtaining a protection order against an individual who has committed elder abuse and expands the ability of law enforcement to assist victims by allowing for arrest without warrants as amended under Section 15-10-3. An order is defined as a restraint order, injunctive order, order of release from custody and may be issued by a circuit, district, municipal or probate court. Elderly person is defined as a person 60 years of age or older.
League Action and Justification: Monitor. While this legislation provides for speedier protection for victims and aligns with that relating to domestic abuse, there is no directly applicable League position on elder abuse.
Bill Progress in Legislature:
02 /23/2017: First Reading and referred to House committee on Judiciary (JUD)
05/04/2017: 3rd Reading Carried Over; JUD Amendment (185589-1); Scott motion to Table adopted by Roll Call; Scott motion to Substitute SB274 for HB304 adopted by Voice Vote; Scott motion to reconsider JUD amendment adopted by Voice Vote; Scott motion to remove from the table the Judy amendment adopted; Scott motion to Carry Over Temporarily adopted by Voice Vote; Third Reading Open; Scott motion to Table Judy amendment adopted by Roll Call; Scott motion to Substitute SB274 FOR HB304 adopted by Voice Vote
SB274 - Elderly, Elder Abuse Protection Orders, authorized, elder abuse defined, Sec. 15-10-3 am'd.
Sponsor(s): Senators Smitherman, Singleton, Dunn, Coleman-Madison and Beasley
Synopsis: Under existing law, elder abuse and neglect and financial exploitation of an elderly person are crimes. This bill would establish the Elder Abuse Protection Order and Enforcement Act.
This bill would: provide for the issuance of elder abuse protection orders to provide greater protection and assistance to victims of elder abuse; define elder abuse and other terms; authorize certain individuals in addition to the victim to petition for an elder abuse protection order; and provide penalties for violating an elder abuse protection order.
League Action and Justification: Monitor. While this legislation provides for protection for victims and aligns with that relating to domestic abuse, there is no directly applicable League position on elder abuse.
03/07/2017: Read for the first time and referred to the Senate committee on Judiciary (JUD);
04/13/2017: 2nd Read and placed on the calendar; pending 3rd Read and Favorable from JUD
04/25/2017: Third Reading Passed; Motion to Read a Third Time and Pass adopted by Roll Call
House Action:
04/25/2017: Read for the first time and referred to the House committee on Judiciary (JUD)
05/03/2017: 2nd Read and placed on the calendar with 1 amendment (185012-3); 3rd Read Passed; JUD amendment offered; Motion to Adopt JUD Amendment adopted by Roll Call; Motion to Read a 3rdTime and Pass adopted by Roll Call
Senate Action:
05/09/2017: Concurrence Requested; Smitherman Motion to Concur In and Adopt adopted by Roll Call
House Action:
05/09/2017: Concurred in Second House Amendment; Signature Requested
Senate Action:
05/09/2017: Enrolled; Forwarded to Governor on May 9, 2017 at 3:30 p.m. on May 9, 2017
Synopsis: Under existing law, elder abuse and neglect and financial exploitation of an elderly person are crimes. This bill would establish the Elder Abuse Protection Order and Enforcement Act.
This bill would: provide for the issuance of elder abuse protection orders to provide greater protection and assistance to victims of elder abuse; define elder abuse and other terms; authorize certain individuals in addition to the victim to petition for an elder abuse protection order; and provide penalties for violating an elder abuse protection order.
League Action and Justification: Monitor. While this legislation provides for protection for victims and aligns with that relating to domestic abuse, there is no directly applicable League position on elder abuse.
03/07/2017: Read for the first time and referred to the Senate committee on Judiciary (JUD);
04/13/2017: 2nd Read and placed on the calendar; pending 3rd Read and Favorable from JUD
04/25/2017: Third Reading Passed; Motion to Read a Third Time and Pass adopted by Roll Call
House Action:
04/25/2017: Read for the first time and referred to the House committee on Judiciary (JUD)
05/03/2017: 2nd Read and placed on the calendar with 1 amendment (185012-3); 3rd Read Passed; JUD amendment offered; Motion to Adopt JUD Amendment adopted by Roll Call; Motion to Read a 3rdTime and Pass adopted by Roll Call
Senate Action:
05/09/2017: Concurrence Requested; Smitherman Motion to Concur In and Adopt adopted by Roll Call
House Action:
05/09/2017: Concurred in Second House Amendment; Signature Requested
Senate Action:
05/09/2017: Enrolled; Forwarded to Governor on May 9, 2017 at 3:30 p.m. on May 9, 2017
Return
More issues